Oh, fudge!
Apr. 26th, 2006 10:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm a doofus. After doing a bit more research, I've figured out that I was wrong when I wrote this post about the Mary of Hungary dress and the Brussels Manuscript, thinking that I had discovered they belonged to the same person. Turns out the book belonged to Mary's aunt, Margaret of Austria. I didn't check the dates carefully. Margaret lived from 1480-1530, and it's her coat of arms inside the book. Mary lived from 1505-1558. They have similar names and titles, so it's easy to see how I goofed.
Now I'm seriously disappointed. Not only are the two items not connected, but I made an obvious and rather elementary mistake in my research. Boy do I feel stupid.
Edit: New userpic made by Flinx. Nice and appropriate, I think.
Now I'm seriously disappointed. Not only are the two items not connected, but I made an obvious and rather elementary mistake in my research. Boy do I feel stupid.
Edit: New userpic made by Flinx. Nice and appropriate, I think.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 04:28 pm (UTC)On the plus side... big Kudos for saying "Hey, I goofed and this is how but now I've fixed it."
no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 06:08 pm (UTC)However, keep in mind that even this late, books were gifted and re-gifted as lavish presents. It's not impossible that Marguerite may have gifted the book to Mary at some point, or loaned it to her for a time. My own quick-skim research hasn't come up with a reliable provenance, and the on-line catalogues are being intractable (in French... Coincidence?) so i can't try to find more about it.
Of course, I broke my own cardinal rule of researching manuscripts by running my first search on just Brussels Manuscript. ::sigh:: Always always include the number, Alix. Silly child.